As of May 2, 2024, five relevant PA State Boards have taken action to protect Pennsylvania youth, warning that licensees who engage in conversion therapy may be subject to administrative discipline. All five State Boards voted to adopt new policies condemning the discredited, pseudoscientific practice of conversion therapy in the Commonwealth. It was also announced that the state board of Nursing joined the Medicine, Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists, and Professional Counselors, Psychology and Osteopathic Medicine who all voted recently to adopt new Statements of Policy (SOP) that oppose the use of conversion therapy on minors in Pennsylvania.

The new policies notify licensees that all five Boards consider the use of conversion therapy to be unprofessional, harmful conduct that may subject any licensee engaging in it to administrative discipline.

Sometimes referred to as reparative therapy, sexuality counseling, or sexual orientation/gender identity change efforts, conversion therapy refers to any practice that seeks or purports to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

The Trevor Project – a national organization devoted to ending suicide among LGBTQ+ young people – along with the Pennsylvania chapter of the National Association of Social Workers and the Pennsylvania Psychology Association told State Boards earlier this year that conversion therapy on minors remains an issue in the Commonwealth despite an August 2022 Executive Order from former Governor Tom Wolf protecting Pennsylvanians from the invalidated practice.

Among the numerous national and global health associations that strongly oppose conversion therapy due to its lack of scientific evidence and its heightened risk of causing harm to minors are the following:

American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry\
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Academy of Nursing
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists
American College of Physicians
American Medical Association
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychoanalytic Association
American Psychological Association
Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
National Association of Social Workers
Pan American Health Organization
World Medical Association
​World Psychiatric Association

The new SOPs will be effective upon publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

Anyone can file a complaint against a licensed professional engaging in unprofessional or harmful conduct like conversion therapy via the PA Department of State website.

Today, May 16, 2024, PA Commonwealth Court ruled for the petitioners (i.e., Pennsylvania School Boards Association, Inc., School District of Pittsburgh, Central Bucks School District, and Upper Darby School District) in their suit against the PA Department of Education and PA Ed. Secretary Dr. Khalid Mumin. The ruling in a case originally argued on February 7th sought relief by the petitioners effectively stuck down the New Age-Out Plan which extended the period under which a child with disabilities may be entitled to a FAPE beyond the end of the school year in which the child with disabilities turns 21 to his/her 22nd birthday.

Extending the Age-Out Plan came as a result of a Settlement Agreement and Release (Settlement Agreement) in which the PDE agreed, beginning with the 2023-24 school year, to change its Age-Out Plan expiration from the end of the school year in which a child with disabilities turns 21 to his/her 22nd birthday. PDE thus moved to implement, publish, and enforce the New Age-Out Plan, which became effective no later than September 5, 2023.

According to the Court, importantly PDE “did not notify the LEAs, including Petitioners, of the New Age-Out Plan before it entered into the private Settlement Agreement on August 30, 2023.” The Court also held that PDE “did not follow the required rulemaking procedures to implement it, nor did it submit it to the Legislative Reference Bureau as required by the Regulatory Review Act (RRA).”

As a result, Petitioners, because they did not have prior notice of the New Age-Out Plan, did not budget for the new, additional services they would need to provide to eligible students, and they are now ineligible for related funding. Thus, Petitioners filed an Application for Special Relief seeking a preliminary injunction on the basis that PDE’s implementation of the New Age-Out Plan violated state law, including the PA School Code. Petitioners clearly alleged in the Petition for Review that PDE’s implementation of the New Age-Out Plan has harmed them in terms of the unanticipated number of students who could return to school, and the associated costs and expenses for which they risk losing federal funding.

The Court’s ruling states that PDE “gave LEAs a mere six days’ notice that, to comply with the Model Policy and State Plan and to continue to receive federal funding, they would have to offer a FAPE to eligible students until their 22nd birthdays with unbudgeted funds.”

Importantly, the ruling also states that PDE “changed the Age-Out Plan via the Settlement Agreement without complying with the CDL and RRA rulemaking procedures despite a history of promulgating Section 11.12 of its Regulations in accordance with the CDL and RRA. In fact, the PDE did not submit the New Age-Out Plan to those processes.

The Court also ruled that PDE “extended the period under which a child with disabilities may be entitled to a FAPE beyond the end of the school year in which the child turns 21, which expands upon the School Code’s meaning  and, thus, effectuated a substantive change to the School Code and the Department’s Regulations.”

In sum, the Court ruled that, “[b]ased on the foregoing, the New Age-Out Plan is a binding regulation with the effect of law and, thus, the Department (PDE) had to promulgate it through formal rulemaking notice and comment requirements pursuant to the CDL and the RRA. Because the Department (PDE) did not do so, the New Age-Out Plan is void ab initio and unenforceable.”

As a result of today’s ruling, LEAs are advised to seek legal counsel to determine how they should respond moving forward, particularly as we near graduation ceremonies.

Note: PAPSA is not qualified to provide legal counsel and this document is not intended to provide legal advice. It is merely informative and should in no way be used to make decisions that should be guided by consultation with legal counsel.

Click here to view the Court’s Decision and Order.