USDE Rescinds Book Ban Guidance (January 25, 2025)

In a January 24, 2025 statement, the U.S. Department of Educationā€™s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) rescinded all guidance that said school districts could violate civil rights law by implementing book bans. The statement said that removing ā€œage-inappropriateā€ books from schools is a decision that should be made by parents and communities, and OCR ā€œhas no role in these matters.” As a result, OCR promptly dismissed 11 complaints related to book bans.

In addition, OCR eliminated the position of book ban coordinator, whose job was to develop training for schools on how book bans targeting specific communities and driving ā€œhostile school environmentsā€ might run counter to federal civil rights laws.

Source: K-12 Dive

Impact of New Executive Orders Remains to be Seen (January 24, 2025)

On the day of his inauguration, President Donald Trump signed several executive orders to eliminate efforts to provide protections for LGBTQ+ students and increase educational access for Hispanic, Native American, and Black students. In one executive order, Trump directed the U.S. government to only recognize two sexes ā€” male and female ā€” based on reproductive cells and directs federal agencies to use its definition of sex to enforce laws, including Title IX. The order also defines ā€œfemaleā€ as someone who produces ā€œthe large reproductive cellā€ and ā€œmaleā€ as someone who produces ā€œthe small reproductive cellā€ and says that ā€œsexā€ is ā€œnot a synonym for and does not include the concept of ā€˜gender identity.” According to the order, federal funds, should not promote the notion that individuals can assess their own gender or that a spectrum of genders exist, and described such claims as false and labeling them ā€œgender ideology.ā€ At this point, it is unclear how this assessment will immediately impact schools or their LGBTQ+ students.

Also that day, the President also rescinded several Biden-era executive orders that sought to increase educational access to underrepresented students. Among their many goals, they aimed to increase federal funding access to minority-serving institutions, including historically Black colleges and universities and Hispanic-serving institutions. He also struck down  a 2024 executive order that established a White House initiative to increase educational access through Hispanic-serving institutions. 

On the following day, the Trump administration announced a directive ending the practice of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection agents avoiding ā€œsensitiveā€ areas ā€” including elementary and secondary schools, colleges, hospitals and churches ā€” for enforcement actions.

It is expected that legal challenges will mount against these and other actions taken by the President.

For more from K-12 Dive, click here.

Ed. Associations Provide Guidance Re. Immigration Raids on Schools (January 23, 2025)

Education associations and immigration advocacy groups have been evaluating what a January 21st U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directive that lifted the practice of avoiding immigration enforcement at locations where students gather would actually mean to schools. In a message posted to its website on Jan. 21, The School Superintendents Association (AASA) said it was unclear if the directive means that ICE enforcement activities would take place on school property. AASA also posted a reminder that the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. Doe said states cannot constitutionally deny students a free public education based on their immigration status.

AASA  said it anticipates that ICE agents may request data from schools and advises school leaders to ensure staff are trained on the protections for studentsā€™ data under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). AASA has also offered recommendations in an online posting for how to prepare for potential ICE enforcement on school campuses, what to consider if a studentā€™s parents have been detained, and other potential scenarios.

In addition, in a fact sheet on the DHS policy change, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) said all people in the U.S. have certain rights regardless of immigration status, including Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches and seizures and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent when confronted by law enforcement.
Likewise, the National Newcomer Network (NNN), a project of The Century Foundation, outlined three main recommendations for districts and schools:
-Stay updated on federal policy. A districtā€™s legal team should analyze changes to policy and communicate those interpretations to district and school leaders.
-The district should develop or re-release guidance on how school staff should interact with immigration enforcement authorities. Guidance, training materials and best practices should be shared with front office staff, bus drivers and other employees.Ā 
-School leaders should reaffirm their commitment to children and families, including by sharing resources about their rights to education and any available community-based supports.Ā 

For more from K-12 Dive, click here.

Schools may Now FaceĀ Immigration Raids (January 22, 2025)

On January 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lifted the practice of avoiding immigration enforcement at locations where students gather. In fact, according to DHS, schools are no longer off limits for immigration enforcement operations since elementary and secondary schools, colleges, hospitals, and churches will no longer be considered ā€œsensitiveā€ areas, which used to compel agents from conducting raids in those facilities. Protected areas also included places where children, teens and young adults gather, such as playgrounds, recreation centers, child care centers, school bus stops, vocational or trade schools, and preschools.

A statement from the DHS says that ā€œ[c]riminals will no longer be able to hide in Americaā€™s schools and churches to avoid arrest. The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense.ā€

For more from K-12 Dive, click here.

U.S. House Passes Bill to Ban Transgender Women and Girls from Girls’/Women’s Sports (January 19, 2025)

On January 14, 2025, the U.S, House voted 218-206 to ban transgender girls and women from girlsā€™ sports in federally-funded schools by amending Title IX, the federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in educational institutions. This bill, the first federal anti-trans law brought to a vote in the 119th Congress. If passed into law, this legislation would change Title IX and revoke federal funding for schools that allow trans girls and women in sports teams that align with their gender identity. Public K-12 schools would be implicated by this new rule, as well as colleges and universities. The bill was brought by Rep. Greg Steube of Florida, who reintroduced legislation he had previously tried to get through the House, alongside an identical bill in the Senate from Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama.

This legislation would change the actual statute of Title IX to explicitly exclude transgender people from a federal civil rights law ā€” a major setback for LGBTQ+ rights advocates that fear it would leave trans and nonbinary students more open to discrimination and with fewer avenues to fight it. Notably, the effect of this law would go further than a recent judicial ruling in Kentucky that rolled back Title IX protections nationwide for LGBTQ+ students. 

The Senate version of the bill is not yet scheduled for a vote.

For more information from The 19th, click here.